Montpelier City Council Divided Over City Manager’s Departure and Financial Package
The recent decision by Montpelier’s City Council to part ways with long-time City Manager Bill Fraser has sparked heated debate and public scrutiny. The contentious 4-2 split vote last week solidified the council’s previous unanimous decision to terminate Fraser’s contract, triggering a substantial severance package of approximately $236,000 outlined in his employment agreement.
Fraser’s potential retirement, which he had been contemplating, could have averted the significant financial implications associated with his contract’s premature termination. The contract, in effect since February 23, 2022, and scheduled to last until March 1, 2026, detailed the terms of the severance payout, drawing from the city’s general fund reserve.
According to the contract, Fraser, in the event of involuntary nonrenewal in February 2025, is entitled to a lump sum payment totaling $236,775. This amount covers a year’s salary, health insurance, and additional expenses, including mandatory payroll contributions. While some councilors supported this decision, others expressed reservations and dissent.
Councilor Cary Brown, who initially opposed Fraser’s termination, commended his contributions and integrity, emphasizing the need for a more respectful exit. Councilor Lauren Hierl echoed similar sentiments, highlighting Fraser’s dedication and impending retirement plans. Despite these voices of appreciation, the majority of the council favored a change in leadership and the implementation of term limits.
Councilor Adrienne Gil underscored the importance of new leadership and the need to prevent stagnation, advocating for the nonrenewal of Fraser’s contract. She criticized the severance terms as a “golden parachute,” emphasizing the necessity of a business-oriented approach to the decision-making process. Councilor Tim Heney underscored the council’s obligation to make a definitive choice regarding Fraser’s contract by March 1, 2025, pointing out the existing terms that determined the severance package.
In response to public concerns and criticisms, Fraser clarified the circumstances that would warrant his severance payment, emphasizing the council’s discretionary power in making such decisions. Former council members and public commentators weighed in on the decision, expressing a mix of disappointment, support, and anticipation for new leadership.
As the debate continues to unfold, it is evident that the council’s decision has evoked strong emotions and divided opinions among residents. The impact of this outcome on Montpelier’s governance and future leadership remains a topic of ongoing discussion and reflection. The city’s quest for effective governance and community-oriented leadership will undoubtedly shape its trajectory in the years to come.
With the council’s resolution of this matter, Montpelier stands at a crossroads, poised to embrace change and chart a new course in its civic leadership. The legacy of Bill Fraser and the lessons learned from this decision will undoubtedly leave a lasting imprint on the city’s political landscape, inviting reflection, dialogue, and transformation. As Montpelier navigates this period of transition and introspection, the winds of change and possibility beckon a new era of governance and community engagement.
